We firmly believe that Greece is not facing an over-tourism problem, but rather an infrastructure problem on some islands, which need improvements in order to successfully manage the increased tourist flows. This is an important distinction from the description of “over-tourism”, which is often used to describe the situation without capturing the real challenges facing the country. We fully agree with the views expressed in the Kathimerini article of 13.06.2024 https://www.kathimerini.gr/society/563075893/i-dipli-anagnosi-toy-ypertoyrismoy/
entitled “The double reading of hypertourism” and we would like to analyse it further from a professional perspective.
Analysis of the Article
The article examines the issue of overtourism in Greece from two perspectives, acknowledging the benefits of increased tourism on the one hand, and the challenges it brings, especially in terms of infrastructure, on the other. While the term ‘overtourism’ may sound worrying, the article clarifies that the real problem lies in the inadequate infrastructure of some islands, not in the increase in tourism itself.
Greece has experienced impressive tourism growth in recent years, with some islands becoming extremely popular destinations for visitors from all over the world. However, as the article rightly points out, this increased demand has put pressure on local infrastructure such as transport, waste management, and water resources, which needs to be addressed immediately to ensure the sustainability of these destinations.
Proposals for Infrastructure Improvement
The article stresses the need for targeted infrastructure investment so that the islands can better manage the increased tourist flows. Improving ports, upgrading the road network and managing natural resources more effectively are key areas to be emphasised. The proper use of available European funds, such as those from the Recovery Fund, can play a decisive role in this direction.
In addition, it is proposed to promote a sustainable tourism model that focuses not only on the quantity but also on the quality of the services provided. This strategy includes encouraging quality tourism, which attracts visitors with higher economic capacity and lower environmental impact, while ensuring the preservation of cultural heritage and local identity.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the Kathimerini article clarifies that the debate on overtourism should focus on the real needs and the potential of Greece to upgrade its infrastructure, instead of following exaggerated expressions that do not correspond to reality. Improving infrastructure and developing a sustainable tourism model are key factors in maintaining the growth of tourism in Greece and strengthening the country’s economy. We fully agree with the analysis and proposals in the article, as they reflect a realistic and strategic approach to managing tourism flows in a sustainable and responsible manner.
